CLINICAL ETHICS, BIOETHICS, AND LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BEGINNING AND END OF LIFE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47230/unesum-ciencias.v9.n1.2025.149-163

Keywords:

Clinical ethics, beginning and end of life, bioethics, law, institutional committees.

Abstract

Clinical ethics, a branch of ethics, addresses ethical and moral dilemmas in medicine and healthcare, particularly those related to the beginning and end of life. Closely linked to bioethics, which examines ethical issues in biology and medicine, and to law, given the legal implications of these dilemmas, clinical ethics provides a multidisciplinary approach to complex situations. This research analyzes the relationship between clinical ethics, bioethics, and law in addressing these challenges. Findings highlight the importance of their interaction to ensure comprehensive discussions and well-founded decisions that respect patients' rights and dignity. Institutional ethics committees play a crucial role in interpreting and applying ethical principles, promoting fair and equitable decisions while safeguarding ethical and legal standards in clinical practice. In conclusion, clinical ethics, in conjunction with bioethics and law, is essential for addressing dilemmas surrounding the beginning and end of life, ensuring integrity and the protection of patients' rights during critical moments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mario González Arencibia, Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas

Centro de Estudios de Gestión de Proyectos y Toma de Decisiones; Facultad de Informática Organizacional; Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas; La Habana, Cuba

Omar Mar Cornelio, Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas

Centro de Estudio de Matemática Computacional; Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas; La Habana, Cuba

References

Aristóteles. (2012). Ética a Nicómaco. Alianza Editorial.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.

Bellizzi, S., & De Nicolao, G. (2018). Decision making algorithms: the moral and ethical limits of machine therapy. In 2018 23rd International Conference on Methods Models and Systems of Automation and Information Sciences (MMSAIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Bok, S. (2003). Reflections on privacy and confidentiality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(3), 265-278.

Callahan, D. (1995). Hablando de ética en la atención médica. Frontera Norte, 7(14), 7-23.

Cassel, C. K. (1991). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(10), 639-645.

Elliott, C. (1996). The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender.

Emanuel, E. J., et al. (2016). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 315(4), 407-409.

Emanuel, L. L., & Emanuel, E. J. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Jama, 267(16), 2221-2226.

Engelhardt, H. T. (2003). The foundations of bioethics. Oxford University Press.

Ferrell, B. R., & Coyle, N. (2008). The nature of suffering and the goals of nursing. Oncology Nursing Forum, 35(2), 241-247.

Greenbaum, D., Azoulai, Y., & Geva, A. (2016). Transparent artificial intelligence for large-scale decision-making: Prioritizing robustness and agency over accuracy. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(1), 26-35.

Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. E. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Univ of California Press.

Kant, I. (1997). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Alianza Editorial.

Mill, J. S. (2010). Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press.

Pellegrino, E. D. (2011). The patient as person: Explorations in medical ethics. Paulist Press.

Pellegrino, E. D., & Thomasma, D. C. (2007). La ética de la atención médica: Un enfoque católico. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Dabar.

Pollock, D., Kaptchuk, G., Acharya, V., & Knoppers, B. M. (2018). Ethics of using and sharing clinical-generated data for machine learning research. Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development, 3(1), 15-26.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals.

Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2018). A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 365-385.

United States Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). HIPAA. Recuperado de https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

González Arencibia, M., & Mar Cornelio, O. (2025). CLINICAL ETHICS, BIOETHICS, AND LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BEGINNING AND END OF LIFE . UNESUM - Ciencias. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria, 9(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.47230/unesum-ciencias.v9.n1.2025.149-163

Issue

Section

Artículo Originales

Most read articles by the same author(s)