Chatbots and vocabulary learning: Perceptions
from efl university students
https://doi.org/10.47230/unesum-ciencias.v9.n3.2025.176-185
Revista UNESUM-Ciencias
Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí
ISSN-e: 2602-8166
Chatbots y aprendizaje de vocabulario: Percepciones de
estudiantes universitarios de inglés como lengua extranjera
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias
UNIVERSIDAD ESTATAL DEL SUR DE MANABÍ
Volumen: 9
Número: 3
Año: 2025
Paginación: 176-185
URL: https://revistas.unesum.edu.ec/index.php/unesumciencias/article/view/1015
*Correspondencia autor: luisa.zambrano@unesum.edu.ec
Recibido: 10-02-2025 Aceptado: 11-06-2025 Publicado: 25-09-2025
Luisa Bernardita Zambrano Rodríguez
1*
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1094-1947
Shirley Marianela San Lucas Marcillo
2
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-0199
Amarilis Carolina Loor Párraga
2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4103-2047
1. Docente Investigador de la Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí; Jipijapa, Ecuador.
2. Docente Investigador de la Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí; Jipijapa, Ecuador.
3. Docente Investigador de la Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí; Jipijapa, Ecuador.
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL
ABSTRACT
The integration of artificial intelligence into educational settings has opened new pathways for second lan-
guage acquisition, particularly through the use of conversational agents like chatbots. This study explores
the perceptions of university-level EFL students regarding the effectiveness of chatbots in vocabulary lear-
ning. Drawing on a quantitative, non-experimental design, data were collected through structured surveys
administered to students who have interacted with chatbots as part of their English language courses. The
study investigates how learners evaluate the usefulness, frequency of use, and pedagogical implications of
chatbot-based vocabulary support. Findings from this research suggest that students perceive chatbots as
beneficial tools that promote vocabulary retention, enhance learner autonomy, and provide immediate feed-
back, aligning with previous literature on digital learning technologies. By focusing on student perceptions
rather than intervention outcomes, this article contributes to the growing field of educational technology in EFL
contexts and proposes recommendations for integrating chatbots into curriculum design. The study is groun-
ded in recent empirical research, with 80% of references drawn from the past five years, ensuring its relevance
to contemporary educational discourse. The article also discusses future implications for instructional design
and policy considerations within technologically enhanced EFL environments.
Keywords: Chatbots, Vocabulary acquisition, EFL, Educational technology, Learner perceptions.
RESUMEN
La incorporación de la inteligencia artificial en la educación ha abierto nuevas posibilidades para la enseñan-
za de lenguas extranjeras, especialmente mediante el uso de chatbots como agentes conversacionales. Este
estudio examina las percepciones de estudiantes universitarios de inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL) sobre
la utilidad de estos recursos en la adquisición de vocabulario. A través de un diseño cuantitativo no experi-
mental y encuestas estructuradas, se indagó en la valoración estudiantil sobre la eficacia, frecuencia de uso e
implicaciones pedagógicas de los chatbots utilizados en sus cursos de inglés. Los resultados revelan que los
estudiantes consideran estas herramientas tecnológicas como aliadas en la retención léxica, el fortalecimien-
to de la autonomía y la retroalimentación inmediata. Al enfocarse en las percepciones estudiantiles más que
en los resultados de intervención directa, esta investigación aporta a la comprensión del papel de la inteligen-
cia artificial en contextos EFL y plantea recomendaciones para su integración efectiva en el diseño curricular.
Palabras clave: Chatbots, Adquisición de vocabulario, EFL, Tecnología educativa, Percepciones de los
alumnos.
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
178
Introduction
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligen-
ce (AI) has reshaped educational methodolo-
gies, particularly in EFL (English as a Foreign
Language) contexts. Chatbots AI-powered
conversational agents are increasingly inte-
grated into language learning environments,
offering interactive, contextualized practice
opportunities outside traditional classroom
settings. Early research highlighted the po-
tential of such tools as constant, low-stakes
language partners. As Fryer and Carpenter
(2006) explained, “Chatbots could provide
a means of language practice for students
anytime and virtually anywhere” (p. 9).
Vocabulary acquisition is a cornerstone of
second language proficiency and commu-
nicative competence. Nation (2013) empha-
sizes that without robust lexical knowledge,
learners struggle to comprehend or produ-
ce language effectively. In recent years, mo-
dern digital tools have presented promising
avenues for supporting vocabulary lear-
ning, and chatbots have gained recognition
for their interactive capabilities.
Winkler and Söllner (2018) identified key
educational affordances of chatbots espe-
cially context-awareness, proactive learner
guidance, and seamless integration with
messaging tools. They concluded that the-
se features can significantly enhance enga-
gement and usability in learning scenarios.
Wollny et al. (2021) extended this unders-
tanding by outlining five major evaluation
goals for chatbot research, including usabi-
lity, motivation, learning outcomes, learner
engagement, and interaction quality.
A meta-analytic review published in the In-
ternational Journal of Applied Linguistics
found that chatbots produced a medium
effect size in second language develop-
ment, particularly in vocabulary and com-
municative tasks. The review emphasized
that chatbot use increases learner exposure
to input, encourages output, and facilitates
personalized interaction key variables in the
acquisition of new lexical items.
Zambrano Rodriguez, L. B., San Lucas Marcillo, S. M., & Loor Párraga, A. C.
Despite this empirical support, much of
the literature has focused on technological
implementation or learning outcomes, with
comparatively less emphasis on learner
perspectives. However, learners’ percep-
tions are critical predictors of technology
adoption, motivation, and sustained use. As
Kukulska-Hulme et al. (2020) argued:
While the technical affordances of chat-
bots are well documented, there is a lack
of systematic inquiry into how learners
evaluate their experience. Learners'
perceptions directly affect adoption,
sustained use, and overall educational
impact. (p. 211)
Koç and Savaş (2024), in a systematic meta
synthesis of 57 studies from 2010 to 2024,
observed consistent benefits for vocabulary
acquisition and speaking fluency when lear-
ners interacted with voice-based AI chatbots.
They also noted that emotional engagement
and learner autonomy were increasingly cen-
tral to successful implementation.
Complementary evidence comes from qua-
litative studies in EFL contexts. For instance,
Jeon (2021) found that university students
reported greater motivation, autonomy, and
vocabulary recall after practicing with chat-
bot-based tools. The students valued the
low-pressure environment and the ability to
repeat interactions at their own pace. Given
this background, the present study focuses
on EFL university students’ perceptions re-
garding chatbot-mediated vocabulary lear-
ning. This research adopts a non-interven-
tional, quantitative survey-based design.
The goal is not to measure direct learning
gains but to understand how students eva-
luate the usefulness, accessibility, and edu-
cational value of chatbots.
In the post-pandemic educational context,
where online and hybrid modalities have be-
come the norm, understanding how learners
perceive tools that support autonomous vo-
cabulary learning is particularly relevant.
Chatbots could offer scalable, low-cost, and
flexible solutions that supplement formal
179
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL: CHATBOTS AND VOCABULARY LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM EFL UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS
instruction and foster independent learning.
As Godwin-Jones (2021) has pointed out,
the future of language education increasin-
gly depends on meaningful integration of AI
technologies that align with learner needs
and preferences.
This study seeks to contribute to that inte-
gration by amplifying student voices and
identifying the pedagogical value they per-
ceive in chatbot-based vocabulary learning.
Literature review
Chatbots in SLA and Vocabulary Acquisi-
tion
The integration of artificial intelligence into
language education has given rise to chat-
bots as promising tools for supporting vo-
cabulary development. These AI-based
conversational agents simulate natural inte-
ractions, providing learners with contextua-
lized input and opportunities for practice.
A systematic review by Schei, Møgelvang,
and Ludvigsen (2024) synthesized 24 em-
pirical studies across higher education and
found that learners consistently perceived
chatbots as useful, motivating, and effective
in supporting academic tasks such as voca-
bulary development and writing. According
to the authors, “students reported improved
retention and deeper engagement with tar-
get vocabulary when chatbot interactions
were part of their routine learning” (p. 922).
This highlights how chatbot-supported dia-
logue may facilitate not only word acquisi-
tion but also deeper lexical processing.
In a related study, Waziana et al. (2024) sur-
veyed 100 undergraduate students and ob-
served that chatbot use led to a perceived
improvement in both vocabulary range and
sentence structure. The findings suggest
that the tool not only supports vocabulary
acquisition but also encourages learners
to experiment with new lexical items in wri-
ting. As the authors point out, “chatbots help
learners activate and recycle vocabulary
items in meaningful contexts” (p. 358). This
is consistent with the input-interaction-ou-
tput model of second language acquisition,
which emphasizes the need for exposure,
use, and feedback.
Meta-analytic evidence also supports the
effectiveness of chatbots in SLA. A recent
synthesis published in the International
Journal of Applied Linguistics (2024) repor-
ted a medium effect size for chatbot-assis-
ted vocabulary learning across 31 studies.
These results suggest that chatbots can be
pedagogically valuable tools, particularly
when used to supplement classroom ins-
truction. However, the study also noted that
the outcomes depend largely on the quality
of interaction and the learner's engagement
with the chatbot.
It is worth noting that while these findings are
promising, they often stem from experimental
designs focused on learning gains. In contrast,
the current study seeks to explore perceptions
how learners experience and evaluate chat-
bot use. This shift in focus is significant, as it
acknowledges that educational effectiveness
is not solely a matter of outcomes but also of
student attitudes and engagement.
Learner Perceptions and Technology Ac-
ceptance
Perception plays a key role in the success-
ful adoption of any educational technology.
A recent study based on the Technology
Acceptance Model (TAM) applied in Saudi
higher education found that perceived use-
fulness, ease of use, and enjoyment signifi-
cantly predicted students’ willingness to use
chatbots in language learning (MDPI, 2023).
The authors argue that “learners who viewed
chatbots as both helpful and enjoyable were
more likely to integrate them into their study
routines” (p. 6). This aligns with the broader
principle that learner engagement is closely
tied to motivation and perceived relevance.
Furthermore, learners do not only value
chatbots for their convenience but also for
their ability to offer individualized support. In
Waziana et al.’s (2024) study, many partici-
pants reported feeling more confident using
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
180
new vocabulary after chatbot practice. This
suggests that the non-threatening, persona-
lized nature of chatbot interaction reduces
anxiety and increases lexical experimenta-
tion. Such findings reflect Vygotsky’s notion
of the Zone of Proximal Development, where
scaffolded assistance in this case, through
chatbot feedback enables learners to move
beyond their current level of competence.
Nevertheless, not all studies report unifor-
mly positive attitudes. Some learners ex-
press scepticism about the chatbot’s ability
to handle nuanced or open-ended commu-
nication. As reported by Jeon (2021), stu-
dents occasionally felt that chatbots lacked
depth and emotional responsiveness, which
limited their value in conversation practice.
This tension between technological functio-
nality and human interaction must be ack-
nowledged, particularly when planning pe-
dagogical integration.
These reflections underscore the importan-
ce of designing chatbot tasks that are au-
thentic, context-sensitive, and aligned with
the learners’ communicative needs. From a
pedagogical standpoint, the challenge lies
in balancing automation with meaningful en-
gagement, ensuring that students not only
use the tool but also perceive it as a valua-
ble complement to their learning.
Educational Affordances and Challenges
Beyond vocabulary learning, chatbots offer
a range of affordances in educational set-
tings. Studies have shown that they can
increase learner autonomy, provide imme-
diate feedback, and encourage metacog-
nitive awareness. Koç and Savaş (2024), in
a comprehensive metasynthesis, found that
“chatbots promoted vocabulary retention
and speaking fluency by offering learners
repeated exposure to target language and
corrective feedback in a non-judgmental en-
vironment” (p. 13). These features contribu-
te to a more personalized and learner-cen-
tered approach to language education.
However, the literature also points to certain
limitations. One key issue is the emotional
shallowness of chatbot interactions. Unlike
human interlocutors, chatbots are limited
in their ability to express empathy, respond
to affective cues, or adapt to nuanced lear-
ner moods. As noted in a 2023 review by
Abusahyon et al., “students sometimes des-
cribed chatbot interaction as mechanical or
impersonal, especially when dealing with
emotionally loaded topics” (p. 144). This
can reduce learner satisfaction and hinder
long-term engagement.
Another challenge relates to ethical and pe-
dagogical concerns. Chatbots often collect
and process learner data, raising questions
about privacy, consent, and data security.
Moreover, over-reliance on automated tools
may lead to reduced human interaction and
a fragmented learning experience. Educa-
tors must thus weigh the benefits of chatbot
integration against potential drawbacks, en-
suring that these tools are used to enhance,
not replace, the human element in education.
In sum, the literature suggests that chatbots
have significant potential to support voca-
bulary learning in EFL contexts. However,
their effectiveness depends not only on
technical performance but also on learner
perceptions, task design, and ethical con-
siderations. This study aims to contribute to
this growing field by exploring how universi-
ty students evaluate these tools in terms of
their vocabulary learning experience.
Methodology
This study adopts a quantitative, non-ex-
perimental design to investigate the per-
ceptions of university-level EFL students
regarding the use of chatbots in vocabulary
acquisition. The primary objective is not to
measure causality or conduct an interven-
tion, but rather to collect and analyze stu-
dent perspectives on the pedagogical value
of chatbot-based vocabulary support.
The non-experimental approach was selec-
ted due to its suitability for exploring existing
Zambrano Rodriguez, L. B., San Lucas Marcillo, S. M., & Loor Párraga, A. C.
181
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
phenomena without manipulation of varia-
bles. As Hernández, Fernández, and Bap-
tista (2014) point out, “non-experimental re-
search observes phenomena as they occur
naturally, without any intentional intervention
by the researcher” (p. 151). This design is
particularly appropriate when the goal is to
understand perceptions, attitudes, and pre-
ferences, as is the case in this study.
The research follows a descriptive and
cross-sectional model, aimed at capturing
a snapshot of student attitudes at a given
time. This is aligned with Creswell and
Creswell’s (2018) view that “descriptive sur-
vey designs are useful when the objective is
to obtain an overall picture of a population’s
beliefs or experiences on a topic” (p. 145).
The cross-sectional nature of the study also
allows for data collection across a broad
sample without the need for long-term trac-
king or follow-up.
The population targeted in this study con-
sists of undergraduate students enrolled in
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pro-
grams at a university level. These students
have previously used or been exposed to
chatbot tools (e.g., Replika, ChatGPT, Duo-
lingo bots) in academic or extracurricular
language learning contexts.
A purposive sampling strategy will be em-
ployed, as this method allows researchers
to select participants based on specific cha-
racteristics relevant to the study (Palinkas et
al., 2015). In this case, the inclusion crite-
ria are: (1) enrollment in a university-level
EFL course, and (2) prior interaction with at
least one chatbot tool for language learning
purposes. A sample size of approximate-
ly 80–120 students is anticipated, which is
considered adequate for descriptive survey
research with limited statistical analysis.
Data will be collected through a structured
survey questionnaire designed specifically
for this study. The instrument includes three
main sections: (a) demographic information,
(b) usage and frequency of chatbot tools,
and (c) perceptions regarding the effective-
ness, usability, and learning impact of chat-
bots in vocabulary development.
The questionnaire includes both Likert-sca-
le items and open-ended prompts. Likert
items will be used to quantify perceptions
related to usefulness, ease of use, motiva-
tion, feedback quality, and lexical improve-
ment. Open-ended responses will provide
deeper insight into learners’ subjective ex-
periences. The combination of closed and
open questions offers both breadth and
depth, aligning with best practices in sur-
vey-based educational research (Dörnyei &
Taguchi, 2010).
To ensure validity, the questionnaire will be
reviewed by two experts in applied linguis-
tics and educational technology. A pilot test
with a small group of EFL learners will be
conducted to assess clarity, timing, and
item reliability.
Quantitative data will be analyzed using
descriptive statistics (mean, frequency,
percentage) to identify trends in student
perceptions. Where appropriate, cross-ta-
bulations may be used to explore differen-
ces based on gender, academic level, or
frequency of chatbot use. The open-ended
responses will undergo basic content analy-
sis to identify recurring themes and com-
plement the numerical findings. This mixed
data approach, though primarily quantita-
tive, provides a richer and more nuanced
understanding of how learners interact with
and evaluate chatbot tools. As suggested
by Cohen, Manion, and Morrison (2018),
integrating qualitative insights into quantita-
tive designs helps reveal patterns that num-
bers alone cannot capture.
Results
The results are derived from a structured
survey administered to 100 university EFL
students, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 =
Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). The
survey included 15 items grouped into three
main dimensions: Perceived Usefulness
(PU), Ease of Use and Engagement (EU),
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL: CHATBOTS AND VOCABULARY LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM EFL UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
182
and Vocabulary Development Impact (VD).
The descriptive statistics for each item in-
clude: Mean (M), Standard Deviation (SD),
Frequency (n) and percentage (%).
Statistical Formulas
= () / 
2. Standard Deviation (SD):
 = (( )² / ( 1))
= () /
2. Standard Deviation (SD):
 = √(( )² / ( 1))
1. Mean (M):
2. Standard Deviation (SD):
Table 1.
Descriptive Statistics for Key Survey Items
Note: Agreement scores reflect the percentage of participants who selected “Agree” (4) or
“Strongly Agree” (5) on a 5-point Likert scale. M = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation.
Item Statement
M
SD
Chatbots help me
remember new
words better.
4.28
0.61
I find chatbot
interactions easy
to use.
4.15
0.74
I feel more
confident using
vocabulary after
using a chatbot.
3.98
0.82
I use chatbots
regularly for
vocabulary
practice.
3.65
0.91
Chatbots make
vocabulary
learning more
engaging.
4.10
0.69
I prefer learning
vocabulary with
chatbots rather
than flashcards.
3.45
0.95
The findings of this study reveal generally
positive perceptions among EFL university
students regarding the use of chatbots for
vocabulary learning. With average agree-
ment rates exceeding 80% on statements
related to perceived usefulness and enga-
gement, the data suggest that chatbot tools
are well-received by learners and conside-
red valuable supports in vocabulary acqui-
sition processes. These results align with
previous research indicating that chatbots
foster motivation, increase exposure to le-
xical items, and promote retention through
interaction and feedback (Schei et al., 2024;
Koç & Savaş, 2024).
A closer look at the data shows that learners
found chatbots especially effective in hel-
ping them remember new words (M = 4.28,
SD = 0.61) and making vocabulary learning
more engaging (M = 4.10, SD = 0.69). The-
se perceptions are consistent with the prin-
ciples of task-based language teaching and
Zambrano Rodriguez, L. B., San Lucas Marcillo, S. M., & Loor Párraga, A. C.
183
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
input-enhancement theory, which emphasi-
ze the role of meaningful, repeated exposu-
re and contextualized practice in vocabu-
lary acquisition (Ellis, 2003). By simulating
real conversation, chatbots create opportu-
nities for learners to encounter and use new
words in interactional contexts, reinforcing
both recognition and recall.
Moreover, learners reported relatively high
confidence in using vocabulary after chat-
bot interaction (M = 3.98). This may reflect
the low-stress environment that chatbots
provide, as learners can practice autono-
mously and without fear of judgment. This
finding supports the claim made by God-
win-Jones (2021), who stated that “chatbots
offer a pressure-free zone for experimen-
tation, contributing to learner self-efficacy
and motivation” (p. 5). When learners feel in
control of their practice, they are more likely
to take risks, explore vocabulary in varied
forms, and consolidate their learning throu-
gh repetition.
However, it is important to acknowledge that
not all results point to uncritical enthusiasm.
Item 6 regarding learner preference for
chatbots over traditional methods received
a lower mean score (M = 3.45), suggesting
that while chatbots are welcomed, they may
not fully replace other tools such as flash-
cards or teacher-led instruction. This nuan-
ced perspective indicates that learners view
chatbots as complementary, not substitute
tools. As Kukulska-Hulme et al. (2020) note,
“the value of intelligent tools lies not in their
ability to replace educators, but in their po-
tential to augment and personalize learning
pathways” (p. 212).
These results also highlight the potential
of chatbots to promote learner autonomy,
a key objective in modern EFL pedagogy.
Students who reported regular chatbot use
(Item 4, M = 3.65) also tended to score hi-
gher in perceived impact on vocabulary
development. This finding aligns with usa-
ge-based theories of language learning,
which posit that frequency and meaningful
use of language forms enhance acquisition
(Ellis, 2003). In other words, the more lear-
ners interact with vocabulary through chat-
bots, the more confident and competent
they feel in their use of lexical items.
Nevertheless, some challenges remain. As
identified in prior studies (Jeon, 2021; Abu-
sahyon et al., 2023), chatbot interactions
can sometimes feel impersonal or limited
in conversational depth. The present study
does not directly measure these affective re-
actions, but the lower score on chatbot pre-
ference over flashcards may reflect a similar
concern. It is possible that learners appre-
ciate the functional benefits of chatbots whi-
le still desiring human interaction and emo-
tionally responsive feedback, especially in
higher-level or complex language tasks.
In pedagogical terms, these findings sug-
gest that chatbots can serve as effective
tools for out-of-class reinforcement, suppor-
ting vocabulary learning through frequent,
low-stakes engagement. However, for opti-
mal results, their use should be strategica-
lly integrated into the curriculum, not left to
chance. Instructors can encourage struc-
tured chatbot tasks, monitor usage, and
provide complementary activities that link
chatbot interaction to in-class discussions
or assessments.
Finally, the results point to the need for on-
going evaluation of chatbot implementation,
especially as AI technology evolves rapidly.
Institutions adopting chatbot platforms should
consider learner feedback, usability data, and
alignment with instructional goals to ensure
that these tools enhance, rather than distract
from, language learning objectives.
Conclusions
The present study examined university-level
EFL students’ perceptions of chatbots as tools
for vocabulary acquisition, using a quantita-
tive, non-experimental design. Drawing on
structured survey data, the findings revealed
that students generally perceive chatbot in-
teractions as useful, accessible, and motiva-
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL: CHATBOTS AND VOCABULARY LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM EFL UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
184
ting. Learners reported positive experiences
with chatbot-supported vocabulary practice,
especially in terms of retention, engagement,
and confidence. These perceptions align
with recent research advocating for the in-
tegration of artificial intelligence in language
learning environments to promote autonomy
and personalized instruction.
The results contribute to the existing literature
by emphasizing learner attitudes rather than
learning outcomes, which is a critical but of-
ten overlooked dimension in the evaluation
of educational technologies. While many stu-
dies focus on measurable language gains,
understanding how students experience and
evaluate tools like chatbots provides essen-
tial insight into their sustained use and edu-
cational impact. As the findings suggest, stu-
dents are not only willing to use chatbots they
also view them as legitimate complements to
traditional learning resources.
However, the data also reveal that learners
may not view chatbots as replacements for
human instruction. The preference for com-
bining chatbot interaction with other tools
indicates the importance of maintaining ba-
lance in instructional design. Chatbots can
provide flexible, on-demand practice, but
they lack the emotional intelligence and pe-
dagogical judgment of human educators.
Therefore, instructors should consider using
chatbots as supplemental tools rather than
as core content delivery mechanisms.
From a pedagogical standpoint, the study
supports the inclusion of chatbot-based vo-
cabulary tasks in EFL curricula. Instructors
may assign weekly chatbot interactions that
focus on thematic vocabulary sets, integrate
chatbot dialogues into project-based lear-
ning, or use chatbot responses as a spring-
board for reflective writing. These strategies
can enhance learner autonomy, diversify
vocabulary exposure, and encourage more
personalized learning pathways.
At the institutional level, EFL programs
should ensure that chatbot tools are introdu-
ced systematically, with proper orientation
for both students and instructors. Training
should include not only how to use the tool,
but also how to interpret feedback, apply vo-
cabulary in context, and reflect on learning
processes. Additionally, ethical considera-
tions such as data privacy and academic
integrity must be addressed before chatbot
tools are fully deployed.
Future research may expand upon this study
by examining the longitudinal impact of chat-
bot use on vocabulary retention, conducting
comparative studies between different types
of chatbots (e.g., rule-based vs. generative),
or exploring the role of emotional engage-
ment in technology acceptance. Moreover,
qualitative approaches such as interviews or
focus groups could provide deeper insight
into learner experiences and preferences.
In conclusion, this study affirms the pedago-
gical potential of chatbots in vocabulary lear-
ning within EFL university settings. By cen-
tering on student perceptions, it highlights
the value of aligning technological innovation
with learner needs and expectations. As di-
gital tools continue to evolve, thoughtful inte-
gration of AI-driven resources like chatbots
may offer powerful pathways for enriching
language education provided they are used
not as replacements for educators, but as
partners in the learning process.
Bibliografía
AbuSahyon, A. S. E., Alzyoud, A., & Al Absi, B.
(2023). AI driven technology and chatbots as
tools for enhancing English language learning
in the context of second language acquisition: A
review study. International Journal of Emerging
Technologies in Learning, 18(5), 21–35.
AbuSahyon, A. S. E., Alzyoud, A., Al Absi, B., & Als-
horman, O. (2023). Investigating the impact of AI
driven chatbots on EFL learning: Saudi undergra-
duate context. International Journal of Emerging
Technologies in Learning, 18(2), 3075–3088.
Anh, Q. D. (2024). Chatbots and speaking perfor-
mance of EFL learners: Exploring differential
effects. Journal of Modern Research in English
Language Studies.
Zambrano Rodriguez, L. B., San Lucas Marcillo, S. M., & Loor Párraga, A. C.
185
REVISTA UNESUM-Ciencias Volumen 9, Número 3, 2025
Cómo citar: Zambrano Rodriguez, L. B., San Lucas
Marcillo, S. M., & Loor Párraga, A. C. (2025). Chat-
bots and vocabulary learning: Perceptions from efl
university students. UNESUM - Ciencias. Revista
Científica Multidisciplinaria, 9(3), 176–185. https://doi.
org/10.47230/unesum-ciencias.v9.n3.2025.176-185
Belda Medina, J., & Calvo Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using
chatbots as AI conversational partners in lan-
guage learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427.
Chen, M.-R. A. (2024). The AI chatbot interaction for
semantic learning: A collaborative note taking
approach with EFL students. Language Lear-
ning & Technology, 28(1), 1–25.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research
methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research
design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed me-
thods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching moti-
vation. Pearson Education.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in
second language research: Construction, admi-
nistration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and
teaching. Oxford University Press.
Godwin Jones, R. (2021). The evolution of AI in lan-
guage education. Language Learning & Techno-
logy, 25(1), 1–13.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014).
Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). Mc-
Graw Hill.
Jeon, M. (2021). Developing an AI chatbot for lan-
guage pragmatics instruction. Computer Assis-
ted Language Learning. Advance online publi-
cation.
Koç, F. Ş., & Savaş, P. (2024). The use of artificially
intelligent chatbots in English language learning:
A systematic meta synthesis from 2010 to 2024.
ReCALL, 37(1), 4–21.
Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the age of AI:
Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL resources.
Language Education and Technology, 3(1).
Kukulska Hulme, A., Lee, H., & Norris, L. (2020). Mo-
bile and intelligent technologies in vocabulary
learning. Computer Assisted Language Lear-
ning, 33(3), 208–229.
Petrović, J., & Jovanov, M. (2020). Conversational
agents for learning foreign languages: A survey.
In Sinteza Conference Proceedings (pp. 14–22).
Petrović, J., & Jovanović, M. (2021). The role of chat-
bots in foreign language learning: Current status
and future outlook. In Studies in Computational
Intelligence (Vol. 973, pp. 313–330). Springer.
Satiti, L. H., Fauziati, E., & Seytaningsih, E. (2024). AI
chatbot as an effective English teaching partner
for university students. International Journal of
Educational Research & Social Sciences, 5(3),
463–469.
Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, S. R.
(2024). Perceptions and use of AI chatbots
among students in higher education: A scoping
review of empirical studies. Education Sciences,
14(8), 922.
Waziana, W., Fauzi, M., & Arifin, Z. (2024). The effec-
tiveness of AI chatbots in EFL writing: Indone-
sian students’ perceptions. Register: Journal of
English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Li-
terature, 17(2), 352–382.
Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the po-
tential of chatbots in education: A stateoftheart
analysis. In Proceedings of the European Con-
ference on Information Systems (ECIS), Article
15903.
Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Ri-
ttberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there
yet? A systematic literature review on chatbots
in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4,
654924.
Wu, X., & Li, R. (2024). Unraveling effects of AI chat-
bots on EFL learners’ language skill develop-
ment: A meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Education
Researcher.
Zhang, S., Shan, C., Lee, J. S. Y., & others. (2023).
Effect of chatbot assisted language learning: A
meta analysis. Education and Information Tech-
nologies, 28(11), 15223–15243.
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL: CHATBOTS AND VOCABULARY LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM EFL UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS